Showing posts with label Reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reports. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2016

Globe to Globe Hamlet in Morocco



On 14th Mars, I had the opportunity to attend the famous Shakespeare’s play “Hamlet”. The play was performed by the Shakespeare’s globe theatre, which is a foundation that aims at exploring, studying and presenting Shakespeare's work. The event was part of a 2-year adventure initiated by the foundation to perform Hamlet in every country of the world. In this article, I will give a short biography of Shakespeare, an overview of Hamlet, and my personal impressions on the play.


Shakespeare’s Biography

William Shakespeare is an English poet, playwright, and actor considered as one of the greatest English playwrights. He wrote about 38 plays, 154 sonnets and two long narrative poems.


Shakespeare was baptized on 26 April 1564 in Stratford-upon-Avon. His father John was a successful and rich glover and his mother Mary the daughter of a landowner. When he was 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. In about 1587, he went to London and became an actor and a playwright.

During the 1590s, Shakespeare wrote the majority of his sonnets, whose main issue was lost love. Between 1592 and 1594, the theatres in London were closed because of the plague, so Shakespeare focused on writing two poems, “Venus and Adonis” 1593 and “Lucerce” in 1594. As for his plays, they were written approximately between 1590 and 1613 and classified into three categories:
  • Comedies (e. g. “The Merchant of Venice”, “Much Ado about Nothing”, “A Midsummer’s Night Dream”) 
  • Histories (e. g. “Richard II”, "Henry V") 
  • Tragedies (e. g. “Hamlet“, “Macbeth“, “Romeo and Juliet”, “Othello”, “Julius Caesar”).

Shakespeare died in 1616 and buried in the Holy Trinity Church of Stratford.

Several years after Shakespeare’s death, some researchers and academics especially the “Oxfords” started questioning his existence and the authorship of his poems and plays. They also proposed alternative candidates as the authors of his works such as Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, and Edward de Vere.


Overview on Hamlet

Hamlet or “The Tragedy of Hamlet” is the longest, the most popular and the most powerful plays of William Shakespeare. This tragedy was written at an uncertain date between 1599 and 1602.

Summary

The protagonist of the play is Prince Hamlet of Denmark. After the death of Hamlet’s father, his uncle Claudius took the throne for himself and married his brother’s widow Gertrude. One day, Hamlet’s friends encounter the ghost of the late King and inform Hamlet about it. This latter decides to seek him and talk to him. When the ghost appears to Hamlet, he tells him that he was murdered by Claudius and asks for revenge. Despites his confusion and uncertainty, Hamlet decides to prepare secretly a plan to avenge his father. Since then, Hamlet’s behavior becomes weird and insane for Ophelia, the girl he loves, his mother and the others.

After that, a series of events follow on. Hamlet kills mistakenly Polonius, Claudius’s advisor and Ophelia’s father, who was spying his conversation with his mother; Ophelia becomes crazy and commits suicide after her father’s death; Ophelia’s brother Laertes decides to kill Hamlet to avenge his father and sister; Hamlet invites some actors to perform a play about a murdered king in front of Claudius and Gertrude, and studies Claudius’s reaction during the play; Claudius conspires with Laertes to kill Hamlet.

In the last scene, Hamlet fights with Laertes and kills him and Claudius, while his mother drinks by mistake the poisoned wine that was prepared for him. At the end, Hamlet decides to commit suicide by drinking the dregs of the poisoned wine, and tells Horatio to tell his story to the world.


Short analysis

From a content point of view, Hamlet is a tragedy that deals with many political, social, religious and psychological issues. On the one hand, it describes the political context of Denmark and the wars with its neighbors. On the other hand, it addresses many controversial issues such as revenge, suicide, love and loyalty. It also contains a vivid dramatization of insanity, sadness and human uncertainty. That’s why many psychoanalysts consider this play as a rich source of human thinking, emotions and behaviors. Furthermore, feminists consider it a good reference to understand the woman’s situation in early modern England where men wielded absolute power. They especially focus on studying the characters of Ophelia and Gertrude and discuss their lives and deaths.

From a linguistic perspective, Shakespeare’s language is known to be difficult, complex and elaborate, especially for contemporary readers, first because his work is written in Early Modern English that may contain obsolete words, and second because he uses highly developed verse techniques such as metaphors and rhetorical forms.  Surprisingly, when his plays are performed in theatre, language has never been an obstacle for audiences to understand the story and follow the action.


My Impressions on the Play

First of all, I consider myself lucky because I had the opportunity to attend one of the most famous Shakespeare’s plays. I really liked the play and everything about it.

- All actors are talented, they showed a deep understanding of the characters they are playing and they genuinely portrayed them. They have great control of their vocality and they read their scripts smoothly. Their movements and the interactions with each other were flexible and harmonious. In short, I really enjoyed the performance and was so moved by the actors’ emotions that I forgot, at a certain point, that I was watching a play and started believing they are real characters.


- The actors are polyvalent, they play their characters, they sing, they play music (each using a different instrument), they dance, and all this in a wonderful way.

- The actors played different characters in the play except Hamlet. For example, the actor who played Polonius played also the roles of the priest and a gravedigger. The actor who played Claudius played also the ghost of Hamlet’s father, and an actor. The actress who played Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, played also the roles of a gravedigger and an actress. I think this reveals a remarkable talent and high skills, because even if these characters are completely different, actors were able to switch from one to another with proficiency and flexibility.

- Something I’ve never seen before and that I really appreciated is that everything on the stage was organized during the performance, and by the actors themselves. The actors change their clothes in front of the audience to pass from one act to another. The scenery is changed and the set pieces moved dynamically as the play progresses. Although sometimes, a tragedy can be monotonous or boring, but these techniques created ambiance on stage and brought more energy to the play.


- For the same reason of making the play more active and dynamic, music, singing, dancing and choreographies were included in some scenes of the play. This also helped to lighten the dramatic aspect of the story. Another good point in the play is that actors, when they are not performing their roles, stay on stage to play sound and music cues that accompany the scenes performed by the other actors.

- The play resources are optimized. Indeed, actors wear the same clothes for the different characters they play, but to respect the characters’ specificity, some accessories are added. The objects of the scenery are also reusable and serve different functions. For example, boxes served as chairs or musical instruments, or were used to construct a bed or a grave.

- Even if I find Shakespeare’s language difficult and complex, but fortunately, a summary of every scene was projected in a screen positioned above the stage. So I could easily follow the story and understand the main events.

*****

Finally, it has to be noted that I’m not an expert in the theatrical art and all my remarks and opinions on the play can’t be taken as a reference to judge its quality. I’m only a book-lover and a spectator who describes a personal experience and gives personal feedback on it.

Amal

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Illumination !!


Like everyone, I read books to seek new ideas, to conquer new worlds and to discover new horizons. For that same reason, and since I knew that the goal of TED is to spread NEW ideas and to share them with other people, I decided to attend the TEDxRabat that took place yesterday, November 24th. The theme of this second edition was “Illumination”, so the key issue of all speakers, each in his field, was to bring ideas that make people live happier, easier and better, despite of all the social, political and economic problems they meet nowadays.

All talks could have been interesting if they had taken in consideration the ultimate goal of TED, which is, I repeat, spreading NEW ideas. Unfortunately, during every talk, I tried to pick up something new, but in vain. And I’m still wondering what’s new in friendship? in the power of energy? in the discovery of hidden waters? in the adoption of entrepreneurs? in the importance of Sufism in the stability of a country? and in the importance of living in the present and learning from the past?!!

Honestly, I think that the topics covered by this event were all old and archaic. I think also that those topics could have had a better impact if they had been used in lectures or debates, but not in TED talks. Moreover, in some talks, the quality of presentation wasn’t that high. 

Maybe the cause of my disappointment is that I had already watched many of TED videos of other countries and I started comparing them to what I saw yesterday, and I can say that the gap between the two levels is very obvious.

But to be fair, the organization of the event was a good one, the timing was respected and the animation was a success. The choice of the videos shown between talks was also excellent, especially the second video about the “Before I die, I want to …” wall. I genuinely liked this video because I found the idea so simple but innovative and that’s why it became popular and loved by people worldwide. I liked also the motive behind this idea, which is, according to the speaker “Thinking about death clarifies your life”.

Anyway, I don’t regret being a part of this event, because I was able to have a personal opinion about it, and to see what’s good and what must be improved in the next editions.


Amal.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Disappointment !



When I was walking downtown, I saw a group of booths displaying books, so I decided to have a look. In a signboard put next a booth, I read:
The ministry of Culture organises the 3rd edition of "The regional Book Fair" of the region of Rabat-Sale-Zemmour-Zaer from 25 July to 23 August under the slogan "Books in the service of the grassroots culture".

I was then surprised because I hadn’t heard anything about this fair before!!

When I started my visit to the fair, I was totally disappointed :
  • Only few people were displaying books, maybe a dozen.
  • Some of the booths are displaying used books.
  • Most books are targeted to children!!!
  • Gastronomy books were displayed outside, as if the only concern of woman is cooking!
  • There is a big lack of books of all languages (Arabic, French and English….), especially new books.

At home, I tried to search on the net some information about the fair, but I didn’t find anything too, even in the official website of the ministry of culture!

Frankly, this fair isn’t up to a city like Rabat! However, I’ll try to be positive and say that since this is only the third edition, the fair isn’t mature enough. So, I hope the organisers will give more interest to it and I look forward to seeing a serious change in the next editions.

Amal.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Time to read, Time to live


The 18th International exhibition of books and publishing took place in Casablanca between 10 and 19 February 2012, this edition focused on the theme: “Time to read, time to live”.


 Last Saturday, I visited the exhibition and made some remarks:

  1. The place was very crowded of people, which means that Moroccans become more interested to reading, I was so glad to see that :)
  2. There were a large number of kids; most of them are accompanied by their parents. This means that parents become aware of the necessity to encourage their children to read. Furthermore, the exhibition itself contained many publishing houses displaying books for kids.
  3. Many countries participated to this exhibition (more than 40 countries according to the SIEL website); most of them are Arab countries, such as Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iraq. There were also publishing houses from US, France, Spain and Turkey.
  4. The books that were most displayed and bought are novels, religion books and gastronomy books.
  5. The organisers didn’t forget to display Amazigh books in order to promote the Amazigh culture.
  6. The exhibition suffered from a lack of organisation, in fact, the books were not sort by topic or by author and there were no computer applications to help customers find the books they want. I had prepared a book list to buy and I struggled to find some of them.
  7. There was a lack of non Arab books, especially English and Spanish books.
I think that such an event is very interesting, because it encourages people to read more and to be in touch with culture, but I hope that the organisers will find out solutions for the remaining problems in the next editions.

Amal.